What Happens When you Successfully Craft the Manuscript that is fit for Manuscript Submission:
After drafting the manuscript according to the guidelines, submit the paper to the publication firms like Springer, IEEE, T&F, or Wiley because these are the publications that are recognized for their standards. Moreover, select the research proposal journal that aligns with the scope of these journals. Subsequently, submit your manuscript to the publisher through the submission portals such as Scholarone or Manuscript Central.
Scholarone manuscripts assist in aligning your work with the reputed journal expectations. Publishers accepting manuscripts is a great thing for every person who pursues research engineering. Unfortunately, after the manuscript gets submitted some people may undergo the revise and resubmit phase. The following steps are used as an effective way to successfully publish your manuscripts.
ScholarOne Manuscripts is a popularly used platform by academic journals to preside over manuscript submissions. It furnishes authors with an uncomplicated interface to upload their papers, trace the review procedure, and communicate with editors and reviewers. Manuscripts of Scholarone are well assembled to break hard shells which can be turned into user- understandable ideas.
The manuscript submission will be accepted, rejected, or asked to revise and resubmit. What to do if your manuscript is under the revise and resubmit section?
Steps to be Followed When Your Manuscript Submission Requires a Revise and Resubmit:
The first and foremost thing that needs to be noted is that the comment review and resubmit are actually a positive signature of your manuscript getting accepted by the journal reviewers. Usually, the person who submits the paper for review will wait for a certain to get back a reply from the journals. The time in which the manuscript is submitted might be exhausting because most people will fear what happens if the manuscript gets rejected by the concerned publication.
Receiving a request to review and resubmit your manuscript is common in academic publishing. It signifies that your work is good but requires fewer corrections for final publications. Here’s how to handle it:
What’s a review paper/Survey paper?
A review/survey paper draws on previously published publications. It does not present novel research. Review articles often review the existing work on a topic to describe the current level of knowledge on the subject. A review paper's main purpose is to present evidence supporting a specific fact in a field. As a result, a substantial portion of the article should be a summary of the facts that support or refute that reality. Additionally, mention the experimental methods utilized to create the data.
-
Review Feedback Thoroughly:
This section should be informative and precise, also the name, affiliations, word count, and main idea of the paper should be clear so that the reviewers will get the main theme of your project with much ease.
Once you’ve observed the feedback, design a well-structured revision plan. Kick-off by prioritizing the reviewers' prime recommendations. This might incorporate redrafting the introduction to escalate the quality of your research question, reconceptualizing data to reinforce your findings, or refining your argumentation in the manuscript. A well-informed plan lends a helping hand to handle all feedback extensively and effectively.
-
Execute a Revision strategy:
Proceed with the well-assembled plan to label each reviewer’s comment. This implicates clarifying strategies, reinforcing altercations, or refurbishing literature reviews to prop up your findings. With your plan in place, check what are the areas that lack attention during the initial manuscript submission. Give ample amount of attention to the reviewers’ comments and address each point with much care. Implement substantial changes where necessary, such as rewriting sections for clarity or incorporating additional strategies to support your argument. Make sure that your revisions align with the journal’s guidelines.
-
Craft a Response Letter:
A response letter is to acknowledge the reviewer's comments and to let know how well the reviewer's comments helped in improving the overall quality of the project. The response letter will be crafted in a manner such that all the comments that are given by the reviewers are properly analyzed and necessary alterations are made. Proper explanations for each feedback from the reviewer will increase the chance of successful manuscript submission.
-
Reapplying Your Manuscript:
It's essential to highlight the transitions that you have made according to the reviewer's comments during the successive manuscript submission. After revisions, prepare an elaborative response letter indicating the modifications that are made in the manuscripts.
Waiting for the Acceptance after Manuscript Submission:
If you get the comment of revise and resubmit, this itself is a positive signature. This denotes that your research incorporates the qualities that are expected by the publications except a few. So the area (Engineering area, Management area) where it lacks was the only thing that you need to concentrate on. View this comment with a positive outlook to enhance your manuscript before final manuscript submission. Right after making the necessary modifications, the chances of getting your manuscript selected will drastically increase until then keep your hopes high.
