+91 8122890553
Begin Research work with GoToppr
Home Header proof

Articles published to spread awareness related to Predatory publishing

Hundreds of scholarly articles, including thirty-eight research papers, have been produced warning about predatory publishers since the phrase was first used in 2010. The think, check, submit, the program has been established to assist authors by scientific associations and publishers, including Springer Nature. But it is insufficient. The research scholars who are not aware of predatory publishing will become a victim because most of the scholars will look for fast publication due to lack of time. Research scholars receiving publication assistance from GoToppr won't have to worry about predatory publishing because the our team will handle the entire journal process.

Identification of Predatory Publishers

There are more than ninety checklists available to assist a scholar in spot predatory journals by looking for traits like shoddy presentation or titles with phrases like international. This is a sizable amount for authors. The creation of only three of the lists involved the use of research data. Paywalled lists of reputable journals and list of predatory journals demonstrate the demand for unambiguous, reliable advice. These lists, however, are inconsistent. The presence of a journal in controlled indexes like the Web of Science, participation in organizations like the Committee on Publication Ethics, or inclusion in the Directory of Open Access Journals is not enough to ensure quality. These lists have been breached by predatory journals, and new journals must publish for one year before they can submit an application for indexing. A scoping assessment of articles about predatory journals discovered that their descriptions occasionally matched, occasionally did not, and occasionally directly disagreed. A skilled researcher with more experience in the field may identify bogus publications with ease. As a result, research scholars must seek advice on all aspects of their work. Since GoToppr offers end-to-end guidance academics will be well-informed about the journals they plan to publish.

Characteristics of predatory publishers

Predatory journals prioritize profit over scholarship due to their self-interest, which is typically pecuniary. They exhibit the traits listed below:
Incorrect or misleading information

This also applies to the publisher's image. Opposed statements, bogus impact factors, wrong address, misreporting the editorial board, false assert of indexing and membership in the corporation, and false assert regarding the accuracy of peer review are common features of predatory journals' websites and emails. A PhD scholar who is new in the research field is unaware of the journal process, hence it is easy to mislead scholars who are looking for fast publication. They will promise an instant publication in exchange for a fee, but even if their paper is accepted, it won't count toward their doctoral degree.
Inadequate transparency

In academic publishing, transparency in operational processes such as how editorial judgments, payments, and peer review are carried out is now more of an aspiration than a best practice. Second, predatory journals lack transparency, which makes them significant enough to be highlighted separately. Publishers who engage in predatory behavior frequently omit to include their contact information or specifics about article processing fees. Editorial board members and editors are frequently unreliable. It is always preferable for research scholars to receive publication aid from someone who has more publications in reputable journals. For scholars who are requesting publishing assistance, the GoToppr team will handle the entire process up until the paper is published in a journal because the team has extensive experience in the journal procedure and has been in the research field for more than 17 years.
Aggressive and irresponsible soliciting

Predatory publications frequently use aggressive solicitation, such as sending out several emails, even if genuine journals may occasionally ask for manuscripts. These could sound overly favorable or reference researchers' prior works while emphasizing the urgent need for submissions on the topic for an upcoming issue. The invitee's expertise falling outside of the journal's purview is a very evident red flag.
Other criteria

The most contentious decision is to ignore peer review quality, despite the fact that poor peer review is frequently a defining characteristic of predatory publications. Peer review is crucial, but is merely stating that it is now impossible to measure it. Unfortunately, many reputable journals fall short of making their peer-review procedures adequately open, for example by not disclosing the feedback provided by peer reviewers and other information. Journal quality, the effectiveness of peer review, and dishonesty are now too subjective to be included.

Techniques to prevent Fake journals

Combating predatory publishing requires cooperation and backing. Predatory publication must be combated by ongoing, flexible efforts. As long as institutions utilize a scholar's output of papers as a criterion for graduation or career promotion, the threat is unlikely to go away. Predatory publications thrive in environments that encourage the "publish or perish" mentality, lack of awareness of predatory publishing, and difficulty distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate publications. Predatory journals are also quick to adjust to rules and countermeasures. It has become easier for fraudulent publishers to pass for real ones online as scientific publishers experiment with new forms and economic structures. In our call to action, we extend an invitation to others.


If a website falls into the category of amateur and commercial, it is fairly simple to spot a predatory publication. Particularly given that they mention money and peer review right away on the page. A research scholar can consult research expertise like GoToppr or their supervisor about journals before proceeding in it. They can easily identify a fake journal.

Publishing in predatory journals is completely worthless, a waste of money, and can harm the reputation of a qualified researcher. Be aware of fake journals. A scholar or academics should only concentrate on reputed journals from the UGC care list.

A PhD scholar must have a minimum of two research papers published in reputed journals under the UGC care list to earn a PhD. The GoToppr team provides full assistance in the preparation and publication of research papers.

GoToppr Footer

31/5-B4, 3rd Vayal Street,
Vadalivali, Kottar, Nagercoil,
Tamil Nadu 629002.
Contact Us
Phone: +91 8122890553
Email: enquiry@gotoppr.com
Publish your research articles in SCI/Scopus Journals

One-stop solution for all of your PhD research

Talk with expert


© 2024 GoToppr